1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 50 A.D.3d
  5. 50 A.D.3d 469 (2008)
 

KALT v. RITMAN

50 A.D.3d 469 (2008)

856 N.Y.S.2d 69

HARRY KALT, Respondent, v. SIDNEY RITMAN, Defendant, and HBS, LTD., Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

Decided April 17, 2008.

While the conclusions of a fact-finding court should not be disturbed on appeal unless they obviously could not have been reached under any fair interpretation of the evidence, especially when the findings rest in large measure on witness credibility (Watts v State of New York, 25 A.D.3d 324 [2006]), our reach in reviewing the evidence in a nonjury trial is as broad as that of the trial court (see Universal Leasing Servs. v Flushing...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases