Ordered that on the Court's own motion, the notice of appeal from the order dated December 12, 2006, is deemed a premature notice of appeal from the judgment (see CPLR 5520 [c]); and it is further,
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.
Contrary to the appellant's contention, the Supreme Court did not err in concluding, in effect, that the petitioner, as an outgoing law firm discharged without cause, was entitled to
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.