VALENTIN v. MELCAR GARAGE, INC.


49 A.D.3d 463 (2008)

854 N.Y.S.2d 131

EDDIE H. VALENTIN, Respondent, v. MELCAR GARAGE, INC., Appellant, et al., Defendants.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

Decided March 27, 2008.


Melcar's motion was properly denied for lack of documentation showing, inter alia, exactly who paid plaintiff and supervised his daily activities, and that such person or entity, if not Melcar itself, is Melcar's alter ego (see Hughes v Solovieff Realty Co., L.L.C., 19 A.D.3d 142, 143 [2005]). In view of the foregoing, we need not reach Melcar's argument that plaintiff's injuries are not "grave" within the meaning of the statute...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases