1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.Rptr.3d
  4. 76 Cal.Rptr.3d
  5. 76 Cal.Rptr.3d 428 (2008)
 

MOSS v. COUNTY OF HUMBOLDT

Nos. A114205, A114622.

76 Cal.Rptr.3d 428 (2008)

162 Cal.App.4th 1041

Michael MOSS, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. COUNTY OF HUMBOLDT et al., Defendants and Respondents. Michael Moss, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. County of Humboldt et al., Defendants and Appellants.

Court of Appeal of California, First District, Division Three.

May 7, 2008.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Harland Law Firm, Allison G. Jackson, Richard Smith, Eureka, for Plaintiff and Appellant in No. Al 14205 and Plaintiff and Respondent in No. A114622.

Tamara C. Falor, County Counsel and Carolyn J. Ruth, Deputy County Counsel, for Defendants and Respondents in No. Al 14205 and Defendants and Appellants in No. Al 14622.

McGUINESS, P.J.

These two appeals require us to decide the appropriate level of review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)1 for a subdivision project that was initially approved with a mitigated negative declaration but later languished in litigation for so long that its tentative map expired. The Board of Supervisors of the County of Humboldt (County) determined an environmental impact report (EIR) is now required for...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases