The court properly exercised its discretion in denying defendant's mistrial motion, made after the court had completed its charge to the jury, that was based on the prosecutor's attempt in summation to explain the absence of fingerprint evidence. The comment constituted a fair response to the defense summation (see People v Overlee,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PEOPLE v. SIMPSON
50 A.D.3d 452 (2008)
855 N.Y.S.2d 500
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. NICHOLAS SIMPSON, Appellant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided April 15, 2008.
Decided April 15, 2008.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.