Plaintiffs allege, inter alia, legal malpractice stemming from the Taub defendants' representation of them in a real estate transaction in which they were the purchasers. Although they could have interposed their claims as cross claims in a prior action in which they and the Taub defendants were codefendants, they were not required to do so either by rule (see CPLR 3011)
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.