Defendant was convicted of having sexual intercourse with his daughter for a period of approximately two years that began when she was seven years old. In light of the child victim's young age and expressed fear of retribution if she disclosed the abuse, her report of this conduct, made approximately three days following the last incident, constituted a prompt outcry which was properly admitted under that exception to the hearsay rule (see People v Vanterpool,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PEOPLE v. STUCKEY
50 A.D.3d 447 (2008)
855 N.Y.S.2d 141
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ANDERSON STUCKEY, Appellant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided April 15, 2008.
Decided April 15, 2008.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
