ANGEL v. O'NEILL


49 A.D.3d 430 (2008)

854 N.Y.S.2d 119

SUSAN ANGEL, Appellant, v. CHRISTOPHER O'NEILL, Respondent.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

Decided March 20, 2008.


A fair interpretation of the evidence supports the hearing court's finding, largely one of credibility, that the notary signature under the jurat purporting to certify defendant's acknowledgment of the subject agreement is a forgery (see Thoreson v Penthouse Intl., 80 N.Y.2d 490, 495 [1992]). Such evidence includes the notary's testimony that the subject signature is not hers, and the obvious differences between the subject signature...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases