SIDELEV v. TSAL-TSALKO


52 A.D.3d 398 (2008)

860 N.Y.S.2d 96

DANIEL SIDELEV, Respondent, v. ROMAN TSAL-TSALKO et al., Appellants.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

Decided June 24, 2008.


The court improvidently exercised its discretion under CPLR 3126 in denying defendants' motion to vacate the striking of their answer, since they did not have "prior notice ... that such a sanction might be imminent" (Postel v New York Univ. Hosp., 262 A.D.2d 40, 42 [1999]). Furthermore, the record indicates that the court never issued a written order at the conclusion of the preliminary...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases