1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 50 A.D.3d
  5. 50 A.D.3d 391 (2008)
 

ORDILLAS v. MTA NEW YORK CITY TRANSIT

50 A.D.3d 391 (2008)

854 N.Y.S.2d 311

MARILOU ORDILLAS, Appellant, v. MTA NEW YORK CITY TRANSIT, Respondent.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

Decided April 10, 2008.

Plaintiff's proffered excuse of law office failure does not adequately excuse the year-long delay in filing a notice of claim (see Seif v City of New York, 218 A.D.2d 595 [1995]). She does not contend that defendant had actual knowledge of the facts and circumstances constituting her claim within the statutorily prescribed 90-day filing period or within a reasonable time thereafter (

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases