1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 183 P.3d
  5. 183 P.3d 237 (2008)
 

STROME v. LANE COUNTY

160600476; A133090.

183 P.3d 237 (2008)

219 Or. App. 519

Lela STROME, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LANE COUNTY, Defendant-Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided April 30, 2008.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

George B. Heilig argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs was Cable Huston Benedict Haagensen & Lloyd, Portland.

Marc Kardell, Lane County Office of Legal Counsel, argued the cause and filed the brief for respondent.

Before LANDAU, Presiding Judge, and SCHUMAN, Judge, and ORTEGA, Judge.

SCHUMAN, J.

Plaintiff sought a judgment declaring that a road running through her property was owned by her and not by defendant Lane County, and an injunction barring the county from proceeding with the process of "legalizing" the road — that is, the process of conducting a survey and issuing an order to eliminate doubts as to the road's location and its lawful establishment as a county road. See ORS 368.201-368.221 (describing process); Shotgun...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases