DISNEY ENTERS. v. TAX APPEALS


10 N.Y.3d 392 (2008)

888 N.E.2d 1029

859 N.Y.S.2d 87

In the Matter of DISNEY ENTERPRISES, INC., et al., Appellants, v. TAX APPEALS TRIBUNAL OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK et al., Respondents.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Decided March 25, 2008.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Morrison & Foerster LLP, New York City (Paul H. Frankel, Craig B. Fields and Roberta Moseley Nero of counsel), Michael H. Salama, Burbank, California, and Brandee A. Tilman for appellants.

Andrew M. Cuomo, Attorney General, Albany (Robert M. Goldfarb, Barbara D. Underwood and Andrew D. Bing of counsel), for Commissioner of Taxation and Finance, respondent.

Judges CIPARICK, GRAFFEO, READ, PIGOTT and JONES concur with Chief Judge KAYE; Judge SMITH concurs in result in a separate opinion.


OPINION OF THE COURT

Chief Judge KAYE.

This appeal tests the validity, under federal law, of New York's franchise tax apportionment formula.

Petitioner, Disney Enterprises, Inc., is a worldwide entertainment conglomerate with hundreds of parents, subsidiaries and affiliates. Disney conducts general operations in three interrelated business segments pertinent to the present appeal: theme parks and resorts, filmed entertainment and consumer products...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases