1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 49 A.D.3d
  5. 49 A.D.3d 346 (2008)
 

MIDTOWN DISTRIBUTORS CORP. v. MUTUAL CENTRAL ALARM SERVICES, INC.

49 A.D.3d 346 (2008)

852 N.Y.S.2d 768

MIDTOWN DISTRIBUTORS CORP., Appellant, v. MUTUAL CENTRAL ALARM SERVICES, INC., Respondent.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

Decided March 13, 2008.

Plaintiff's claims that defendant burglar alarm company installed a different alarm system and a different number of sensors than provided in the parties' contract, and failed to determine that the alarm had been tripped by burglars rather than birds, are barred by the exculpatory clause in the contract (see Sue & Sam Mfg. Co. v United Protective Alarm Sys., 119 A.D.2d 664 [1986]; Nuri Farhardi, Inc. v Albany Ins. Co.,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases