Defendant's medical evidence in support of the motion showed that appellant has normal range of motion in his cervical and lumbar spine and shoulders and that he did not otherwise sustain a serious injury as a result of the accident, and therefore satisfied defendant's initial burden on the motion "notwithstanding the existence of MRI reports indicating that [appellant] had herniated or bulging discs" (Style v Joseph,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
SANTANA v. KHAN
48 A.D.3d 318 (2008)
851 N.Y.S.2d 515
MAYRA SANTANA, Plaintiff, and GERALDO LOPEZ, Appellant, v. NAZAM KHAN, Respondent, et al., Defendants.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided February 21, 2008.
Decided February 21, 2008.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.