Assuming, as petitioner asserts, that he was never served with the three-day notice of preliminary revocation hearing required by Executive Law § 259-i (3) (c) (iii), it does not follow that he was denied due process, or that the entire parole revocation was otherwise rendered fatally defective, where he appeared for the hearing with counsel and did not object thereto, request an adjournment to prepare therefor or contend that he lacked adequate notice of the basis for...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
