The evidence of defendant's unlawful entry into the victim's building was legally sufficient. Although defendant argues that a surveillance video shows the victim permitting defendant to enter the building, the victim testified that he did not open the door for defendant, but he held it open to prevent it from hitting himself.
Defendant's argument that the evidence failed to establish his intent to commit a crime at the time he entered the building is unpreserved...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
