1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 48 A.D.3d
  5. 48 A.D.3d 288 (2008)
 

MATTER OF HOCHHAUSER v. CITY OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING PRESERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT

48 A.D.3d 288 (2008)

853 N.Y.S.2d 22

In the Matter of DAVID HOCHHAUSER, Now Known as DAVID LURIE, Appellant, v. CITY OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING PRESERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT, Respondent, et al., Respondent.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

Decided February 14, 2008.

The determination that petitioner did not sustain his burden of establishing his entitlement to succession rights to his daughter's apartment had a rational basis (see Matter of Pietropolo v New York City Dept. of Hous. Preserv. & Dev., 39 A.D.3d 406 [2007]; Matter of McGann-Wayne v Lippa, 284 A.D.2d 279 [2001]). The inclusion of petitioner in income affidavits submitted by his daughter...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases