Testimony regarding a narcotics sale by a codefendant in defendant's presence did not deprive defendant of a fair trial. The evidence in question was relevant to a conspiracy count in the indictment that was still pending at that point in the trial, and evidence of the codefendant's conduct was not prejudicial to defendant (see People v Delacruz,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PEOPLE v. SANTANA
48 A.D.3d 286 (2008)
852 N.Y.S.2d 73
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JOSE SANTANA, Appellant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided February 14, 2008.
Decided February 14, 2008.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.