The court should have granted defendant's suppression motion. After receiving Miranda warnings from one detective, defendant told another detective about eight hours later that he did not want to talk about any of the burglaries at issue. At this point, the police should have ceased interrogation (see People v Ferro,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PEOPLE v. GRAHAM
48 A.D.3d 265 (2008)
856 N.Y.S.2d 7
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. RUFUS GRAHAM, Appellant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided February 14, 2008.
Decided February 14, 2008.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.