Appellants, the owner and managing agent of the subject building, failed to meet their initial burden of establishing a prima facie entitlement to summary judgment. Appellants failed to address two of the grounds for liability put forth by plaintiffs, i.e., that the smoke detector in the apartment was not maintained in proper working order and that the window guards had been negligently installed, and although appellants attempted to cure these deficiencies in a reply affirmation...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
