SPITZER v. SCHUSSEL


48 A.D.3d 233 (2008)

850 N.Y.S.2d 431

ELIOT SPITZER, as Attorney General of the State of New York, Appellant, v. RICK SCHUSSEL et al., Respondents.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

Decided February 5, 2008.


Generally, leave to amend a pleading is freely granted in the absence of prejudice or surprise to the opposing party. Mere lateness is not a barrier to amendment. To establish prejudice, which must be significant (see Edenwald Contr. Co. v City of New York, 60 N.Y.2d 957 [1983]), there must be some indication that the opposing party will have been hindered in the preparation of its case or prevented from taking some measure to support...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases