FRED MEYER STORES v. GODFREY

0304253; A134247.

180 P.3d 98 (2008)

218 Or. App. 496

In the Matter of the Compensation of Karen M. Godfrey, Claimant. FRED MEYER STORES, Petitioner, v. Karen M. GODFREY, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided March 19, 2008.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Deborah L. Sather, Portland, argued the cause for petitioner. With her on the opening brief and the reply brief were Rebecca A. Watkins and Sather, Byerly & Holloway. With them on the supplemental brief was Lance M. Johnson.

Robert F. Webber, Medford, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the briefs were Arthur W. Stevens and Black, Chapman, Webber, Stevens, Petersen & Lundblade.

Before EDMONDS, Presiding Judge, and WOLLHEIM and SERCOMBE, Judges.


EDMONDS, P.J.

In this workers' compensation case, employer seeks judicial review of the Workers' Compensation Board's order on remand, which held that, because employer had failed to raise an issue on initial board review or judicial review, that issue was not properly before the board on remand. In this judicial review, employer asserts that "[t]he Board abused its discretion by failing to apply its own preservation rule when the Order on Remand imposed an obligation...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases