SASTROM v. PSYCHIATRIC SEC. REVIEW BD.

No. 28473.

938 A.2d 1233 (2008)

105 Conn.App. 477

Roy SASTROM v. PSYCHIATRIC SECURITY REVIEW BOARD.

Appellate Court of Connecticut.

Decided January 29, 2008.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert E. Byron, for the appellant (plaintiff).

Jacqueline S. Hoell, assistant attorney general, with whom, on the brief, were Richard Blumenthal, attorney general, and Richard J. Lynch, assistant attorney general, for the appellee (defendant).

GRUENDEL, LAVINE and MIHALAKOS, Js.


MIHALAKOS, J.

The plaintiff, Roy Sastrom, appeals from the judgment of the trial court dismissing his action for a declaratory judgment against the defendant, the psychiatric security review board. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the court improperly determined that it lacked subject matter jurisdiction to consider his claim that General Statutes § 17a-581 requires the defendant to have a psychiatrist and a psychologist as active, voting members.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases