1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 944 A.2d
  5. 944 A.2d 991 (2008)
 

STATE v. WRIGHT

No. 28633.

944 A.2d 991 (2008)

107 Conn.App. 152

STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. IAN WRIGHT.

Appellate Court of Connecticut.

Decided April 22, 2008.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ian Wright, pro se, the appellant (defendant).

C. Robert Satti, Jr., senior assistant state's attorney, with whom, on the brief, was Jonathan C. Benedict, state's attorney, and for the appellee (state).

McLACHLAN, LAVINE and ROBINSON, Js.

McLACHLAN, J.

The pro se defendant, Ian Wright, appeals from the judgment of the trial court dismissing his motion to correct an illegal sentence,1 filed pursuant to Practice Book § 43-22,2 on the ground that it lacked Jurisdiction to consider the motion. On appeal, the defendant claims that the court had jurisdiction to correct a sentence that violated his constitutional...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases