PS CHEZ SIDNEY, L.L.C., Plaintiff,
v.
UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION, and United States Customs Service, Defendants, and
Crawfish Processors Alliance, et al., Defendant-Intervenors.
United States Court of International Trade.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
June 17, 2008.
June 17, 2008.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
William E. Brown and Arnold & Porter, Washington, DC (Michael T. Shor), for Plaintiff PS Chez Sidney, L.L.C.
Gregory G. Katsas, Acting Assistant Attorney General; Jeanne E. Davidson, Director, Patricia M. McCarthy, Assistant Director, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, U.S. Department of Justice (Franklin E. White); and Andrew G. Jones, Office of Assistant Chief Counsel, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, of Counsel, for Defendant United States Customs and Border Protection.
Neal J. Reynolds, Assistant General Counsel, Office of the General Counsel, United States International Trade Commission (Patrick V. Gallagher), for Defendant United States International Trade Commission.
Adduci, Mastriani & Schaumberg, LLP (Will E. Leonard), for Defendant-Intervenors Crawfish Processors Alliance; Bob Odom, Commissioner, Louisiana Department of Agriculture and Forestry; Louisiana Department of Agriculture and Forestry.
Sonnenschein Nath & Rosenthal, New York City (Michael A. Bamberger), for INA USA Corporation, appearing amicus curiae in support of Plaintiff.
Arnold & Porter, LLP, Washington, DC (Michael T. Shor and Claire E. Reade), for Giorgio Foods Inc., appearing amicus curiae in support of Plaintiff.
Kelley Drye & Warren (David A. Hartquist) and Stewart and Stewart (P. Stewart), for Committee to Support U.S. Trade Laws, appearing amicus curiae in support of Plaintiff.
United States Court of International Trade.
OPINION
WALLACH, Judge.
INTRODUCTION
I
This matter comes before the court following its remand to Defendants United States International Trade Commission (the "Commission") and United States Customs and Border Protection ("Customs"), respectively. In the underlying action, the court held that the support requirement of the Continued Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act of 2000 (the "CDSOA" or...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
