1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 941 A.2d
  5. 941 A.2d 960 (2008)
 

CURCIO v. BAX

No. 28065.

941 A.2d 960 (2008)

106 Conn.App. 307

Gus CURCIO v. Daniel BAX et al.

Appellate Court of Connecticut.

Decided March 11, 2008.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Nathalie Feola-Guerrieri, with whom, on the brief, was Daniel Shepro, Stratford, for the appellant (defendants).

Anthony M. Macleod, Greenwich, for the appellees (plaintiff).

GRUENDEL, HARPER and BERDON, Js.

GRUENDEL, J.

The plaintiff, Gus Curcio, sought damages under General Statutes § 49-8(c),1 a temporary and permanent injunction requiring the defendants, Daniel Bax and Katherine Bax, to execute a release of the security on a promissory note and a judgment that he is not liable to the defendants for further payments. The trial court rendered judgment in favor of the defendants. From that judgment, the

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases