PER CURIAM.
Granted. We find the court of appeal erred insofar as it found relator's October 13, 2006 legal malpractice action was filed outside of the three-year peremptive period. The alleged malpractice occurred on October 17, 2003, and relator's suit was filed within three years of this date. However, we are unable to determine, based on the facts before us, whether the action is perempted because it is unclear whether the October 13, 2006 action was filed within...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
