1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 525 F.3d
  5. 525 F.3d 1327 (2008)
 

MANGOSOFT, INC. v. ORACLE CORP.

No. 2007-1250.

525 F.3d 1327 (2008)

MANGOSOFT, INC. and Mangosoft Corporation, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. ORACLE CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

May 14, 2008.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Donald R. Dunner, Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, L.L.P. of Washington, DC, argued for plaintiffs-appellants. With him on the brief were Don O. Burley; and Erik R. Puknys, of Palo Alto, CA. Of counsel on the brief were Paul J. Hayes and Robert R. Gilman, Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo P.C., of Boston, MA.

Matthew D. Powers, Weil Gotshal & Manges, LLP, of Redwood Shores, CA, argued for defendant-appellee. With him on the brief was Douglas E. Lumish. Of counsel were Paul T. Ehrlich and Leeron G. Kalay.

Before MICHEL, Chief Judge, LINN and PROST, Circuit Judges.

LINN, Circuit Judge.

Mangosoft, Inc. and Mangosoft Corporation (collectively, "Mangosoft") appeal from a final judgment of the district court following a summary judgment order holding that Oracle Corporation ("Oracle") did not infringe Mangosoft's U.S. Patent No. 6,148,377 ("the '377 patent"). Mangosoft, Inc. v. Oracle Corp., 421 F.Supp.2d 392 (D.N.H. 2006) ("Summary Judgment Opinion"). Because Mangosoft's arguments...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases