TARR v. BOB CIASULLI'S MACK AUTO MALL, INC.


943 A.2d 866 (2008)

194 N.J. 212

Carol TARR, Plaintiff-Respondent v. BOB CIASULLI'S MACK AUTO MALL, INC., Defendant-Appellant.

Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided March 27, 2008.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Resa T. Drasin, argued the cause for appellant (Woehling & Freeman, attorneys, Westfield).

Ronald L. Lueddeke, Spring Lake, argued the cause for respondent (Lueddeke Law Firm, attorneys).


Justice LaVECCHIA delivered the opinion of the Court.

This case is before us for a second time on an appeal by defendant, Bob Ciasulli's Mack Auto Mall, Inc. See Tarr v. Bob Ciasulli's Mack Auto Mall, Inc., 178 N.J. 29, 834 A.2d 403 (2003). The issue this round is whether the Legislature, in enacting the Punitive Damages Act, N.J.S.A. 2A:15-5.9 to -5.17 (Act), intended punitive awards to focus only on deterrence of the specific defendant that committed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases