CAPITOL RECORDS INC., a Delaware corporation; Sony BMG Music Entertainment, a Delaware general partnership; Arista Records LLC, a Delaware limited liability company; Interscope Records, a California general partnership; Warner Bros. Records Inc., a Delaware corporation; and UMG Recordings, Inc., a Delaware corporation;, Plaintiffs,
v.
Jammie THOMAS, Defendant.
United States District Court, D. Minnesota.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
September 24, 2008.
September 24, 2008.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Donald B. Verrilli, Jr., Jenner & Block; Andrew B. Mohraz, David A. Tonini, and Timothy M. Reynolds, Holme Roberts & Owen, LLP; and Felicia J. Boyd, Kara L.B. Barrow, and Mary Andreleita Walker, Faegre & Benson LLP; for Plaintiffs.
Brian N. Toder and Bryan L. Bleichner, Chestnut & Cambronne, PA, Counsel for Defendant.
Adam D. Kirschner, United States Department of Justice, and Gregory G. Brooker, Assistant United States Attorney, Counsel for Intervenor United States of America.
Corynne McSherry, Electronic Frontier Foundation, and Rachel C. Hughey, Carlson Caspers Vandenburgh & Lindquist, Counsel for Amicus Electronic Frontier Foundation.
Prentiss E. Cox, University of Minnesota Law School, Counsel for Amicus Copyright Law Professors.
Carl E. Christensen, Christensen Law Office, PLLC, Counsel for Amicus The Intellectual Property Institute at William Mitchell College of Law.
Christine L. Nessa and Marie L. van Uitert, Oppenheimer Wolff & Donnelly LLP, and Eleanor M. Lackman and Robert Alan Garrett, Arnold & Porter LLP, Counsel for Amicus Motion Picture Association of America, Inc.
Tracey Holmes Donesky, Leonard Street and Deinard, PA, Counsel for Amicus The Progress & Freedom Foundation.
United States District Court, D. Minnesota.
MEMORANDUM OF LAW & ORDER
MICHAEL J. DAVIS, Chief Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
This matter is before the Court on Defendant's Motion for New Trial, or in the Alternative, for Remittitur. [Docket No. 109] Defendant Jammie Thomas asserts that the amount of the statutory damages award is excessive and in violation of the due process clause of the United States Constitution. Also before the Court is Plaintiffs' Motion to Amend Judgment. [Docket No. 116...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
