MASON v. W.C.A.B.

No. 1906 C.D. 2007.

944 A.2d 827 (2008)

Barry MASON, Petitioner v. WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD (JOY MINING MACHINERY AND AIG CLAIM SERVICES), Respondents.

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania.

Decided March 18, 2008.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Walter F. Lober, III, Pittsburgh, for petitioner.

Harry J. Klucher and Lee Ann Rhodes, Pittsburgh, for respondent, Joy Mining Machinery.

BEFORE: LEADBETTER, President Judge, PELLEGRINI, Judge, and LEAVITT, Judge.


OPINION BY Judge PELLEGRINI.

Barry Mason (Claimant) appeals from an order of the Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Board) holding that his failure to apply for suitable alternative employment after his forced retirement justified suspension and not modification of benefits as the Workers' Compensation Judge (WCJ) ordered, because, by doing so, he had removed himself from the workforce. Claimant contends that suspension is unwarranted because he established that...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases