1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 940 A.2d
  5. 940 A.2d 742 (2008)
 

PALMER v. FRIENDLY ICE CREAM CORP.

No. 17735.

940 A.2d 742 (2008)

285 Conn. 462

Ellen PALMER et al. v. FRIENDLY ICE CREAM CORPORATION.

Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Decided February 12, 2008.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Deepak Gupta, pro hac vice, with whom were Daniel S. Blinn, Rocky Hill, Anthony J. Pantuso II, Hartford, and, on the brief, Brian Wolfman, pro hac vice, and Scott L. Nelson, pro hac vice, for the appellants (plaintiffs).

William C. Saturley, pro hac vice, with whom were Johanna G. Zelman and, on the brief, Michael J. Rose and Jeffrey A. Meyers, pro hac vice, for the appellee (defendant).

ROGERS, C.J., and KATZ, VERTEFEUILLE, ZARELLA and SCHALLER, Js.

ZARELLA, J.

The sole issue raised by this appeal is whether an order denying class certification is an appealable final judgment. The plaintiffs,1 thirty-seven persons employed as waiters or waitresses by the defendant, Friendly Ice Cream Corporation, appealed from the order of the trial court to the Appellate Court, which dismissed the appeal for lack of a final judgment. We granted the plaintiffs' petition for certification to appeal...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases