SANTILLAN v. ROMAN CATHOLIC BISHOP OF FRESNO

No. B194219.

163 Cal.App.4th 4 (2008)

GEORGE SANTILLAN et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. ROMAN CATHOLIC BISHOP OF FRESNO, Defendant and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Eight.

May 21, 2008.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Arkin & Glovsky, Sharon J. Arkin; Kiesel, Boucher & Larson, Raymond P. Boucher, Patrick DeBlase, Anthony M. DeMarco; The Drivon Law Firm, Lawrence Drivon and David Drivon for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Stammer, McKnight, Barnum & Bailey, Carey H. Johnson and Aimee E. Rainwater for Defendant and Respondent.


OPINION

RUBIN, J.

Plaintiffs George and Howard Santillan appeal from the summary judgment entered for defendant Roman Catholic Bishop of Fresno in this action based on allegations of childhood sexual abuse by one of defendant's former clerics. Because triable issues of fact exist concerning whether defendant had the requisite notice that the offending cleric posed a risk of committing such acts (Code Civ. Proc., § 340.1, subds....

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases