1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 530 F.Supp.2d
  5. 530 F.Supp.2d 1121 (2008)
 

PFEIFFER v. HIMAX TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

No. CV 07-05468 DDP (AGRx).

530 F.Supp.2d 1121 (2008)

Michael PFEIFFER, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. HIMAX TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Max Chan, and Jordan Wu, Defendants.

United States District Court, C.D. California.

January 8, 2008.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jim T. Tice, Kenneth J. Catanzarite, Catanzarite Law Offices, Anaheim, CA, Laurence M. Rosen, Phillip Kim, The Rosen Law Firm, New York City, for Plaintiff.

Bahrain Seyedin-Noor, Betty Chang Rowe, Boris Feldman, Brian Danitz, Wilson Sonsini Goodrich and Rosati, Palo Alto, CA, Katherine L. Henderson, Wilson Sonsinni Goodrich and Rosati, San Francisco, CA, for Defendants.

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO TRANSFER VENUE

[Motion filed on October 24, 2007]

DEAN D. PREGERSON, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on Defendant Himax Technologies, Inc.'s ("Himax") motion to transfer venue to the Southern District of New York pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a), Plaintiffs' motion to consolidate related cases. After reviewing the papers filed by the parties and considering the arguments therein, the Court...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases