SMOLENSKI, P.J.
This case is before us on remand from our Supreme Court. In our previous opinion, we concluded that defendant had not raised any errors warranting a new trial, but determined that he was entitled to be resentenced on the sole basis that the trial court improperly utilized facts not found by a jury in departing from the required sentence. See People v. Uphaus,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.