PER CURIAM.
We affirm the order summarily denying the rule 3.800(a) motion to correct illegal sentence, but not for the reason specified by the trial court.
The state argued that it should be denied as successive because the sole ground had been raised and rejected twice before, and attached copies of defendant's prior rule 3.800(a) motions. The motion was denied for the reasons given in the state's response. Although similar, however, the ground raised in...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.