1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 939 A.2d
  5. 939 A.2d 689 (2008)
 

RUSH v. STATE

No. 31, Sept. Term, 2007.

939 A.2d 689 (2008)

403 Md. 68

Cindi Renee Katherine RUSH v. STATE of Maryland.

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

January 11, 2008.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David A. Martella (Barry H. Hefland, Rockville), on brief, for petitioner/cross-respondent.

Diane E. Keller, Asst. Atty. Gen. (Douglas F. Gansler, Atty. Gen.), on brief, for respondent/cross-petitioner.

Argued before BELL, C.J., RAKER, HARRELL, BATTAGLIA, GREENE, ALAN M. WILNER, (Retired, specially assigned) DALE R. CATHELL, (Retired, specially assigned), JJ.

BATTAGLIA, J.

The case sub judice presents this Court with the issue of whether a police detective's modification of the Miranda warnings to state that Petitioner could be appointed counsel "at some time" satisfied the requirements of Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966). This case also presents us with determining the scope of our appellate jurisdiction to consider a "cross-appeal...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases