SANDISK CORP. v. PHISON ELECTRONICS CORP.

Nos. 3:07-cv-00605-bbc, 3:07-cv-00607-bbc.

538 F.Supp.2d 1060 (2008)

SanDisk Corp., Plaintiff, v. PHISON ELECTRONICS CORP., Silicon Motion Technology Corp., Silicon Motion, Inc. (Taiwan), Silicon Motion, Inc. (California), Silicon Motion International, Inc., Synergistic Sales, Inc., USBest Technology, Inc., Skymedi Corp., Zotek Electronic Co., Ltd., Zodata Technology Ltd., Infotech Logistic LLC, Power Quotient International Co., Ltd., PQI Corp., PNY Technologies, Inc., Kingston Technology Co., Inc., Kingston Technology Corp., Payton Technology Corp., Memosun, Inc., Buffalo, Inc., Melco Holdings, Inc., Buffalo Technology (USA) Inc., Verbatim Corp., Transcend Information Inc. (California, U.S.A.), Transcend Information Maryland, Inc., A-Data Technology Co., Ltd., A-Data Technology (USA) Co., Ltd., Apacer Technology, Inc., Apacer Memory America, Inc., Acer, Inc., Behavior Tech Computer USA Corp., Dane-Elec Memory S.A., and Dane-Elec Corp., USA, Defendants. SanDisk Corp., Plaintiff, v. Phison Electronics Corp., Silicon Motion Technology Corp., Silicon Motion, Inc. (Taiwan), Silicon Motion, Inc. (California), Silicon Motion International, Inc., Synergistic Sales, Inc., USBest Technology, Inc., Skymedi Corp., ChipsBrand Microelectronics (HK) Co. Ltd., ChipsBank Technology (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd., ChipsBank Microelectronics Co., Ltd., Zotek Electronic Co., Ltd., Zodata Technology Ltd., Infotech Logistic LLC, Power Quotient International Co., Ltd., PQI Corp., PNY Technologies, Inc., Kingston Technology Co., Inc., Kingston Technology Corp., Payton Technology Corp., Memosun, Inc., Buffalo, Inc., Melco Holdings, Inc., Buffalo Technology (USA) Inc., Verbatim Corp., Transcend Information Inc. (California, U.S.A.), Transcend Information Maryland, Inc., Imation Corp., Imation Enterprises Corp., Memorex Products, Inc., Add-On Computer Peripherals, Inc., Add-On Computer Peripherals, LLC, Add-On Technology Co., A-Data Technology Co., Ltd., A-Data Technology (USA) Co., Ltd., Apacer Technology, Inc., Apacer Memory America, Inc., Acer, Inc., Behavior Tech Computer USA Corp., Corsair Memory, Inc., DaneElec Memory S.A., Dane-Elec Corp., USA, Edge Tech Corp., Interactive Media Corp., LG Electronics, Inc., LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc., TSR Silicon Resources,' Inc. and Welldone Co., Defendants.

United States District Court, W.D. Wisconsin.

January 28, 2008.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Allen Arntsen, Foley & Lardner LLP, Madison, WI, David Caine, James C. Yoon, Julie Holloway, Lisa Kim Anh Nguyen, Michael A. Ladra, Monica Mucchetti Eno, Olga V. Kotlyarevskaya, Ron E. Shulman, Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, Palo Alto, CA, Jose C. Villarreal, Nicole W. Stafford, Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, Austin, TX, Matthew J. Bye, Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, P.C., Washington, DC, for Plaintiff.

Anthony J. Sievert, Eugenia G. Carter, Christine Yang, Anthony J. Sievert, Whyte Hirschboeck Dudek, Lester A. Pines, Cullen Weston Pines & Bach LLP, David J. Harth, Heller Ehrman LLP, Madison, WI, David Barkan, Fish & Richardson PC, Redwood City, CA, Brian C. Kwok, Perry Clark, Kirkland & Ellis LLP, Anup Tikku, Chien-Wei Chou, Jane C. Schlicht, Jong H. Lee, Michael J. Bettinger, K&L Gates LLP, San Francisco, CA, Rummel Mor Bautista, The Ryan Firm, Anaheim, CA, Alfredo A. Bismonte, Beck, Ross, Bismonte & Finley, LLP, San Jose, CA, Frank J. West, Richard D. Kelly, Robert C. Mattson, Takahiro' Miura, Oblon, Spivak, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt P.C., Alexandria, VA, Allen A. Slaughter, Jr, Byron Todd Jones, Jennifer L. McKenna, Ronald J. Schutz, Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi, LLP, Minneapolis, MN, J. Thomas Haley, Kevin Palmersheim, Haley Palmersheim, S.C., Middleton, WI, for Defendants.


OPINION and ORDER

BARBARA B. CRABB, District Judge.

Recently, plaintiff filed two patent infringement lawsuits in this court. Plaintiff alleges infringement of two patents in Case No. 3:07-cv-00605-bbc and five patents in Case No. 3:07-cv-00607-bbc. The two cases involve many of the same defendants and all seven patents asserted relate to flash memory technology. Case No. 607 has been stayed because the five patents asserted in that case are the subject...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases