PER CURIAM.
Appellant, Edwin Boyd, challenges the summary denial of his motion for voluntary dismissal without prejudice of his rule 3.850 motion and denial on the merits of his rule 3.850 motion. Because Appellant's motion to dismiss was filed pursuant to the mailbox rule on June 26, 2007, prior to the trial court's ruling on the underlying rule 3.850 motion on June 29, 2007, Appellant's motion to dismiss was timely. Although the state filed its response and the...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
