1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 941 A.2d
  5. 941 A.2d 622 (2008)
 

DUGAN CONST. CO., INC. v. NJ TURNPIKE AUTH.

941 A.2d 622 (2008)

398 N.J. Super. 229

DUGAN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant v. NEW JERSEY TURNPIKE AUTHORITY, Defendant-Respondent, and Camp, Dresser & McKee, Inc., and URS Corporation, Defendants.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided February 29, 2008.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

I. Michael Heine, argued the cause for appellant (Heine Associates, attorneys, Cherry Hill; Mr. Heine, on the brief; Mary Ann Hallenborg, New York City, of counsel and on the brief).

William J. Linton, Woodbridge, argued the cause for respondent (Wilentz Goldman & Spitzer, attorneys; Mr. Linton and Jon S. Polevoy, of counsel and on the brief).

Before Judges S.L. REISNER, BAXTER and KING.

The opinion of the court was delivered by

S.L. REISNER, J.A.D.

Plaintiff Dugan Construction Co., Inc. (Dugan) appeals from a February 21, 2007 order of the trial court granting summary judgment dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant New Jersey Turnpike Authority (NJTA).

This case arises from a contract between Dugan and NJTA for remediating polluted groundwater. Dugan claimed $9.5 million for disposing...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases