PER CURIAM.
Appellant challenges the revocation of his probation. We AFFIRM the revocation based on two violations of Condition (5). At the revocation hearing, the State presented no evidence regarding the third alleged violation of Condition (5), committing the offense of neglect of a child without great bodily harm. Accordingly, we REMAND with directions to strike that portion of the order finding this third violation. See, e.g., Sherwood v. State,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.