AUGUST TECHNOLOGY CORP. v. CAMTEK, LTD.

Civil No. 05-1396.

534 F.Supp.2d 969 (2008)

AUGUST TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION, and Rudolph Technologies, Inc., Plaintiffs, v. CAMTEK, LTD., Defendant.

United States District Court, D. Minnesota.

January 3, 2008.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Douglas J. Williams, Ernest W. Grumbles III, Rachel Zimmerman, Rebecca A. Bortolotti and Joseph E. Lee, Merchant & Gould P.C. for and on behalf of Plaintiffs.

Michael Florey, Ann Cathcart Chaplin, David Francescani, Edmond R. Bannon, John D. Garretson and Michael F. Autuoro, Fish & Richardson P.C., Minneapolis, MN, for and on behalf of Defendant.


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

MICHAEL J. DAVIS, District Court.

This matter is before the Court for a Markman Hearing to construe claims in U.S. Patent No. 6,826,298 ("the '6,298 patent"), which describes an "automated, Wafer defect inspection system and a process of performing such inspection."

Background

The inventions of the '6,298 patent were developed by a Minnesota corporation, August...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases