STATE v. CURTIS

No. 20070249.

748 N.W.2d 709 (2008)

2008 ND 93

STATE of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee v. Edward Dana CURTIS, Defendant and Appellant.

Supreme Court of North Dakota.

May 15, 2008.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Cherie LaVonne Clark, Assistant State's Attorney, Fargo, ND, for plaintiff and appellee.

Daniel James Borgen, Grand Forks Public Defender Office, Grand Forks, ND, for defendant and appellant.


CROTHERS, Justice.

[¶ 1] Edward Curtis appeals the district court's judgment entered after a jury found him guilty of harassment. Curtis argues there was insufficient evidence to support the conviction and the offending communication is constitutionally protected free speech. We affirm the district court's judgment.

I

[¶ 2] The facts are undisputed by the parties. On November 22, 2006, Edward Curtis sent a facsimile to many North Dakota...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases