PEITSCH v. KEIZER

042260; A132583.

180 P.3d 1239 (2008)

219 Or. App. 114

Ann PEITSCH and Ralph Peitsch, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Russell J. KEIZER, M.D., Defendant, and Columbia Memorial Hospital and Claude Behrens, P.T., Defendants-Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided March 26, 2008.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jonathan D. Hess argued the cause for appellants. On the briefs were Vance D. Day and Adams, Day & Hill, and Michael Autio and Law Offices of Michael Autio, LLC, Vancouver, WA.

Lindsey H. Hughes, Portland, argued the cause for respondents. With her on the brief was Keating Jones Hughes, P.C.

Before HASELTON, Presiding Judge, and ROSENBLUM, Judge, and NELSON, Judge pro tempore.


PER CURIAM.

Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment, following an adverse jury verdict, in a malpractice action. They assign error both to the trial court's failure to give their requested jury instruction on causation and to the instruction on causation that the court did give. We conclude that neither of those claims of error was preserved for our review, as prescribed by ORCP 59 H. Accordingly, we affirm.

A description of the parties' dispute — and, indeed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases