TOTO v. ENSUAR

A-53 September Term 2007

952 A.2d 463 (2008)

196 N.J. 134

Blase J. TOTO and Betty Toto, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Sheriff's Officer Rolando ENSUAR and Sheriff's Officer Michael Schulze, Defendants-Respondents, and Monmouth County Sheriff Joseph W. Oxley, Monmouth County Sheriff's Office and "John Does # 1-3" (these names being fictitious as true identities are unknown), Defendants.

Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided August 4, 2008.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jeffrey S. Downs argued the cause for appellants (Wong Fleming, Princeton, attorneys; Mr. Downs, Daniel C. Fleming and Linda Wong, on the briefs).

David A. Laughlin, Neptune, argued the cause for respondents (Stout & O'Hagan, attorneys; Linda Grasso Jones, on the letter brief).


Justice WALLACE, JR., delivered the opinion of the Court.

In this case we decide whether the verbal threshold, N.J.S.A. 59:9-2(d), of the New Jersey Tort Claims Act (Act), N.J.S.A. 59:1-1 to 12-3, which essentially requires an objective permanent injury to recover damages, applies to a willful misconduct claim against a public employee. Additionally, we decide whether the trial court's failure to charge the jury that the Act's good faith defense,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases