IN RE ANTHONY A.

No. 28658.

942 A.2d 465 (2008)

106 Conn.App. 389

In re ANTHONY A.

Appellate Court of Connecticut.

Decided March 18, 2008.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gary J. Wilson, Trumbull, with whom, on the brief, was Daniel C. Ford, for the appellant (respondent mother).

Colleen Broderick, assistant attorney general, with whom were Susan T. Pearlman and Stephen G. Vitelli, assistant attorneys general, and, on the brief, Richard Blumenthal, attorney general, for the appellee (petitioner).

David B. Rozwaski, Milford, for the minor child.

McLACHLAN, LAVINE and ROBINSON, Js.


LAVINE, J.

The respondent mother1 appeals from the judgment of the trial court finding the child neglected pursuant to General Statutes § 46b-120(9)(B) and (C). On appeal, the respondent claims that the court improperly found that the child was neglected on the date the neglect petition was filed. We disagree and, therefore, affirm the judgment of the trial court.

The court made the following findings of fact in its memorandum...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases