RAZINK v. KRUTZIG

No. A07-0389.

746 N.W.2d 644 (2008)

Michael Duane RAZINK, et al., Appellants, v. Michael J. KRUTZIG, Respondent, Kathy M. Krutzig, et al., Respondents, Charles Pfeffer, et al., Respondents, S.B. 25, LLC, Respondent, Ocello, LLC, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

April 1, 2008.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David M. Bolt, Christopher J. Hoffer, Soucie & Bolt, Anoka, MN, for appellants.

Frank J. Rajkowski, Lori L. Athmann, Troy Allen Poetz, Rajkowski Hansmeier, Ltd., St. Cloud, MN, for respondent Michael J. Krutzig.

Nicholas L. Klehr, LaBore & Giuliani, Cosgriff & Viltoft, Ltd., Hopkins, MN, for respondents Kathy M. Krutzig, et al.

Andrew T. Shern, Chris Angell, Murnane Brandt, St. Paul, MN, for respondents Charles Pfeffer, et al.

Lawrence J. Skoglund, Carol L. Casey, Erstad & Riemer, P.A., Minneapolis, MN, for respondent Ocello, LLC.

Considered and decided by PETERSON, Presiding Judge; STONEBURNER, Judge; and PORITSKY, Judge.


OPINION

STONEBURNER, Judge.

Appellants challenge summary judgment granted to respondents dismissing their claims that respondents are liable for injuries sustained by one of the appellants when, while operating a snowmobile on land adjacent to a public highway, he struck a sign constructed and/or maintained by respondents. Appellants argue that the district court erred by concluding that: (1) under Minn.Stat....

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases