1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 942 A.2d
  5. 942 A.2d 396 (2008)
 

HARPAZ v. LAIDLAW TRANSIT, INC.

No. 17844.

942 A.2d 396 (2008)

286 Conn. 102

David HARPAZ v. LAIDLAW TRANSIT, INC., et al.

Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Decided March 18, 2008.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Philip F. Spillane, New Milford, for the appellant (plaintiff).

Erik S. Bartlett, for the appellees (defendants).

NORCOTT, KATZ, PALMER, VERTEFEUILLE and SCHALLER, Js.

KATZ, J.

The dispositive issue in this workers' compensation appeal is whether an employer that is deemed "conclusively presumed to have accepted the compensability of the alleged injury" under General Statutes § 31-294c (b)2 because of its failure to contest liability or commence payment of compensation within the time period prescribed is permitted to contest the extent of the claimant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases