1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 941 A.2d
  5. 941 A.2d 301 (2008)
 

ECKERT v. ECKERT

Nos. 17943, 17944.

941 A.2d 301 (2008)

285 Conn. 687

Patricia ECKERT v. David ECKERT.

Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Decided March 4, 2008.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Samuel V. Schoonmaker IV, Greenwich, for the appellant (plaintiff).

George J. Markley, Fairfield, with whom, on the brief, was Michael A. Meyers, for the appellee (defendant).

ROGERS, C.J., and KATZ, PALMER, VERTEFEUILLE and SCHALLER, Js.

SCHALLER, J.

The dispositive issue in the present appeal is whether a clause in a separation agreement that precludes modification of the amount or duration of alimony also bars modification of the definition of "gross yearly earned income," as set forth in a separate section of the separation agreement. The plaintiff, Patricia Eckert, appeals1 from the trial court's denials of her two postdissolution motions seeking a modification of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases