Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
Contrary to the defendant's contentions, the court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying his motion to vacate the order issued upon his default in opposing the plaintiff's motion to enforce the terms of the judgment of divorce compelling him to transfer his interest in the former marital residence to her. The defendant's conclusory denials of service of the plaintiff's motion were insufficient to warrant...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.